Showing posts with label torture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label torture. Show all posts

Friday, 17 December 2010

Psychologists Conducted Torture Sessions for the CIA - Millions of Dollars Involved

The news are now absolutely "official", as official as it gets: straight from the mouth of the global ruling class media. The Associated Press reveals that psychologists - civilians acting as "consultants" for the CIA - conducted torture of people were illegally detained by the US.

This immediately brings up questions of:
o- What is the position of the American Psychological Association on its members conducting torture in violation of all International and US laws?

o- What is the US Government, or its system of justice, going to do about this?

o- It has been almost ten years now that these "allegations" of torture by US services - and now by citizens! as it's being revealed - became first confirmed and now an established fact. To this day no one has been prosecuted, no one punished, not one of the criminals even fired from their jobs, nor charged with anything in Court or in any other sort of procedure. Is it time for the Movement within the US and/or globally to set up its own Peoples' Courts and agencies that will deliver justice? What kind of punishment is fit for a "health professional" who oversaw or conducted several hundreds of torture sessions?

Please read the news article below. I've added some very interesting links at the bottom.

Petros Evdokas
member of Cyprus IndyMedia Collective
http://petros-evdokas.cyprus-org.net/Another-sort-of-Introduction.html

* * *

Officials: CIA gave waterboarders $5M legal shield
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101217/ap_on_re_us/us_cia_waterboarding
By ADAM GOLDMAN and MATT APUZZO, Associated Press
Dec. 17, 2010


WASHINGTON – The CIA agreed to cover at least $5 million in legal fees for two contractors who were the architects of the agency's interrogation program and personally conducted dozens of waterboarding sessions on terror detainees, former U.S. officials said.

The secret agreement means taxpayers are paying to defend the men in a federal investigation over an interrogation tactic the U.S. now says is torture. The deal is even more generous than the protections the agency typically provides its own officers, giving the two men access to more money to finance their defense.

It has long been known that psychologists Jim Mitchell and Bruce Jessen created the CIA's interrogation program. But former U.S. intelligence officials said Mitchell and Jessen also repeatedly subjected terror suspects inside CIA-run secret prisons to waterboarding, a simulated drowning tactic.

The revelation of the contractors' involvement is the first known confirmation of any individuals who conducted waterboarding at the so-called black sites, underscoring just how much the agency relied on outside help in its most sensitive interrogations.

Normally, CIA officers buy insurance to cover possible legal bills. It costs about $300 a year for $1 million in coverage. Today, the CIA pays the premiums for most officers, but at the height of the war on terrorism, officers had to pay half.

The Mitchell and Jessen arrangement, known as an "indemnity promise," was structured differently. Unlike CIA officers, whose identities are classified, Mitchell and Jessen were public citizens who received some of the earliest scrutiny by reporters and lawmakers. The two wanted more protection.

The agency agreed to pay the legal bills for the psychologists' firm, Mitchell, Jessen & Associates, directly from CIA accounts, according to several interviews with the former officials, who insisted on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter.

The company has been embroiled in at least two high-profile Justice Department investigations, tapping the CIA to pay its legal bills. Neither Jamie Gorelick, who originally represented the company, nor Henry Schuelke, the current lawyer, returned messages seeking comment. Mitchell and Jessen also didn't return calls for comment.

The CIA would not comment on any indemnity agreement.

"It's been nearly eight years since waterboarding — an interrogation method used on three detainees — was last used as part of a terrorist detention program that no longer exists," CIA spokesman George Little said.

After the terrorism attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Mitchell and Jessen sold the government on an interrogation program for high-value al-Qaida members. The two psychologists had spent years training military officials to resist interrogations and, in doing so, had subjected U.S. troops to techniques such as forced nudity, painful stress positions, sleep deprivation and waterboarding.

But those interrogations had always been training sessions at the military's school known as SERE — Survival, Evasion, Resistance, Escape. They had never conducted any actual interrogations.

That changed in 2002 with the capture of suspected al-Qaida facilitator Abu Zubaydah (ah-BOO' zoo-BY'-dah). The agency believed tougher-than-usual tactics were necessary to squeeze information from him, so Mitchell and Jessen flew to a secret CIA prison in Thailand to oversee Zubaydah's interrogation.

The pair waterboarded Zubaydah 83 times, according to previously released records and former intelligence officials. Mitchell and Jessen did the bulk of the work, claiming they were the only ones who knew how to apply the techniques properly, the former officials said.

The waterboarding technique involved "binding the detainee to a bench with his feet elevated above his head," formerly top-secret documents explain. "The detainee's head is immobilized and an interrogator places a cloth over the detainee's mouth and nose while pouring water onto the cloth in a controlled manner."

The documents add that "airflow is restricted for 20 to 40 seconds and the technique produces the sensation of drowning and suffocation." The session was not supposed to last more than 20 minutes.

The psychologists also waterboarded USS Cole bombing plotter Abd al-Nashiri (ahbd al-nuh-SHEE'-ree) twice in Thailand, according to former intelligence officials.

The role of Mitchell and Jessen in the interrogation of confessed Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is a bit murkier.

At least one other interrogator was involved in those sessions, with the company providing support, a former official said. Mohammed was waterboarded 183 times in Poland in 2003, according to documents and former intelligence officials.

The CIA inspector general concluded in a top secret report in 2004 that the waterboarding technique used by the CIA deviated from the rules outlined by the Justice Department and the common practice at SERE school. CIA interrogations involved far more water poured constantly over the prisoner, investigators said.

"One of the psychologists/interrogators acknowledged that the agency's use of the technique differed from that used in SERE training and explained that the agency's technique is different because it is `for real' and is more poignant and convincing," the inspector general's report said.

It was not clear whether Mitchell or Jessen made that remark.

Justice Department prosecutor John Durham is investigating whether any CIA officers or contractors, including Mitchell and Jessen, should face criminal charges.

In at least two instances, Mitchell and Jessen pushed back. During Zubaydah's interrogation, the psychologists argued he had endured enough waterboarding, believing they had reached the point of "diminishing returns." But CIA superiors told them to press forward, two former officials said.

In another case, Mitchell and Jessen successfully argued against waterboarding admitted terrorist Ramzi Binalshibh (RAM'-zee bin-al-SHEEB') in Poland, the official said.

On top of the waterboarding case, Mitchell and Jessen also needed lawyers to help navigate the Justice Department's investigation into the destruction of CIA interrogation videos.

Mitchell and Jessen were recorded interrogating Zubaydah and al-Nashiri and were eager to see those tapes destroyed, fearing their release would jeopardize their safety, former officials and others close to the matter said.

They often contacted senior CIA officials, urging them to destroy the tapes and asking what was taking so long, said a person familiar with the Durham investigation who insisted on anonymity because the case's details remain sensitive. Finally the CIA's top clandestine officer, Jose Rodriguez, made the decision to destroy the tapes in November 2005.

Durham investigated whether that was a crime. He subpoenaed Mitchell, Jessen & Associates last year, looking for calendars, e-mails and phone records showing contact between the contractors and Rodriguez or his chief of staff, according to a federal subpoena. They were ordered to appear before a grand jury in northern Virginia in August 2009.

Last month, Durham closed the tapes destruction investigation without filing charges.

From:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101217/ap_on_re_us/us_cia_waterboarding

* * *

The American Psychological Association Meets Dr. Mengele
APA Confab Whitewashes Torture by Shrinks
By Dr. TRUDY BOND
http://www.counterpunch.org/bond08232006.html

"The Task Force Report Should Be Annulled"–Member of 2005 APA Task Force on Psychologist Participation in Military Interrogations Speaks Out
http://www.democracynow.org/2007/6/1/the_task_force_report_should_be

Why Torture Made Me Leave the APA
Jeffrey Kaye left the APA over its complicity in torture by the U.S. government. This is his letter of resignation
http://www.alternet.org/rights/78909/

The Latest from the APA On Torture
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/06/the-latest-from-the-apa-on-torture.html

APA Psychologist's torture debate emails leaked
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/k/g/kgb999/2009/05/apa-psychologists-torture-deba.php

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Saturday, 19 September 2009

"We'll say we were only following orders. Right?"

The Associated Press and other ruling class media are reporting that seven former CIA directors asked President Barack Obama yesterday (Friday) to cancel a criminal investigation of harsh interrogations of "terror suspects" during the Bush administration.

And newly declassified documents obtained by US civil rights lawyers through the Courts, reveal that US State Department officials had tried to set up "Nuremberg defense" arguments - also known as "the good soldier defense" - for themselves and their agents, knowing full well that they were in violation of International and US Laws by torturing, killing, abducting and abusing prisoners during their ongoing "war on terror". And that they would be held accountable for those atrocities. The Nuremberg Defense is a legal defense that essentially states that the defendant was "only following orders".

Please read the relevant news item below, and the documents linked here.



An unusually good entry in wikipedia on the Nuremberg Trials, Geneva Convention and Command Responsibility:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Command_responsibility&oldid=311878905

"...new documents, obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union through Freedom of Information Act litigation, show how State Department officials tried to establish what they called "the good soldier defense" -- in this case, the right of government agents charged with seizing and holding people in violation of international law to claim as a defense that they acted in good faith based on representations as to the legality of the conduct they were undertaking.":
American Diplomats Advocated "Nuremberg Defense"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/01/american-diplomats-advoca_n_274039.html

Efforts to bring these international criminals to justice are still continuing. Please lend your support to US-based and international progressive and radical activists, lawyers, families, prisoners, torture survivors and popular resistance organizations to oppose the US/UK global Junta and punish these despicable subhumans.

Petros Evdokas
petros@cyprus-org.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ex-CIA chiefs seek halt to interrogations probe
By PAMELA HESS, Associated Press Writer – 19 Sep. 2009

WASHINGTON – Seven former CIA directors asked President Barack Obama on Friday to quash a criminal probe of harsh interrogations of terror suspects during the Bush administration.

The CIA directors, who served both Democratic and Republican presidents and include three who worked under President George W. Bush, made their request in a letter Friday to the White House.

Attorney General Eric Holder announced last month that he was appointing an independent counsel to investigate possible incidents of abuse by CIA personnel during interrogations that went beyond guidelines imposed by the Bush administration.

The incidents were referred by the CIA inspector general to the Justice Department during the Bush administration, but Justice officials at the time prosecuted only one case.

"If criminal investigations closed by career prosecutors during one administration can so easily be reopened at the direction of political appointees in the next, declinations of prosecution will be rendered meaningless," wrote the former directors.

The Washington Post reported on its Web site Friday night that the Justice Department will focus on only two or three cases for possible indictment.

One of them, said the newspaper, involved an Afghan prisoner who died after being beaten and chained on a cold night to a concrete floor without blankets. The report cited unidentified officials.

The seven former CIA directors included Michael Hayden, Porter Goss and George Tenet, who served under Bush; John Deutch and James Woolsey, who worked for President Bill Clinton; William Webster, who served under President George H.W. Bush; and James Schlesinger, who ran the agency under President Richard Nixon. Tenet also served under Clinton.

They urged Obama to reverse Holder's Aug. 24 decision to reopen the investigation of interrogations following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

CIA spokesman Paul Gimigliano said the agency is cooperating with the Justice Department review "in part to see that they move as expeditiously as possible."

"The director has stood up for those who followed legal guidance on interrogation, and he will continue to do so," said Gimigliano.

In their letter, the former directors warned that the investigations could discourage CIA officers from doing the kind of aggressive intelligence work needed to counter terrorism and may inhibit foreign governments from working with the United States.

Matthew Miller, Holder's spokesman, said Holder does not believe his probe will affect CIA employees' commitment to their work.

"The attorney general's decision to order a preliminary review into this matter was made in line with his duty to examine the facts and to follow the law. As he has made clear, the Department of Justice will not prosecute anyone who acted in good faith and within the scope of the legal guidance given by the Office of Legal Counsel regarding the interrogation of detainees," Miller said in a written statement.

The former CIA directors also warned that foreign governments may be hesitant to cooperate with the United States if the probe continues.

"As a result of the zeal on the part of some to uncover every action taken in the post-9/11 period, many countries may decide that they can no longer safely share intelligence or cooperate with us on future counter-terrorist operations. They simply cannot rely on our promises of secrecy," the letter says.

The letter said the CIA referred fewer than 20 incidents to Bush administration prosecutors, including the case of CIA contractor David Passaro. Passaro was prosecuted, convicted and sentenced to eight years for beating an Afghan detainee in 2007. The detainee later died.

One former CIA official familiar with the cases now under review said that Bush-era Justice lawyers declined to prosecute either because they were not certain they could win conviction or because some of the CIA personnel involved had already been disciplined by the agency. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the cases.

Though not a signatory to the letter, current CIA Director Leon Panetta also opposed Holder's investigation.

"I think the reason I felt the way I did is because I don't believe there's a basis there for any kind of additional action," Panetta said.

"My concern is ... that we don't get trapped by the past. My feeling is ultimately, we're going to be able to move on," he told reporters this week after a speech in Michigan.


From:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090919/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_cia_interrogations
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Cartoon above is from:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00550/Cartoon_550941a.jpg
author unknown.
From the article titled:
Exclusive: Charges Sought Against Rumsfeld Over Prison Abuse
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1557842,00.html

~~~~~~~~~~